-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 409
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
how-to/command-line-quick-start refactor #1444
Conversation
The command should be You can think of the |
|
||
You can explore other objects in the repository. In particular, the `quick-start` directory which shows example commands to try: | ||
```bash | ||
ipfs cat /ipfs/QmYwAPJzv5CZsnA625s3Xf2nemtYgPpHdWEz79ojWnPbdG/readme |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably time to:
- Update this file and remove the alpha software warning
- use a CidV1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
RE use a CidV1:
Are you saying we should update this tutorial to use CIDv1 instead of CIDv0? Make sense to me.
Trying to dogfood our own docs here, I see https://docs.ipfs.tech/how-to/best-practices-for-ipfs-builders/#use-cidv1-for-future-proof-addressing-and-case-insenstive-contexts -> should we just add a step in to this telling the user to run ipfs add --cid-version 1
(this is probably a good opportunity for me to get more hands on with IPFS)
Also, seems like that comment could apply to all docs in the tutorial, so seems like we should create an issue to update tutorials to use CIDv1?
RE update the readme:
Created this PR ipfs/kubo#9590 pls take a look and lmk if that captures the suggested updates
docs/install/ipfs-companion.md
Outdated
@@ -7,17 +7,24 @@ description: The IPFS Companion browser extension allows you to interact with yo | |||
|
|||
IPFS Companion allows you to interact with your IPFS node and the extended IPFS network through your browser. The add-on is available for Brave, Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Opera. It enables support for `ipfs://` addresses, automatically loads websites and file paths from an IPFS gateway, allows you to easily import and share a file with IPFS, and more. | |||
|
|||
IPFS Companion works in tandem with an IPFS node running on your local machine, so make sure you have a [node installed](ipfs-desktop.md) before installing this add-on. | |||
## Prerequsities |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like that you're adding this Prerequsities
section. I'd note that you can still use IPFS companion without a local node though you lose some of the functionality.
For example, you can load websites with DNSLink via a gateway.
@lidel WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@2color updated the copy based on your point ^ https://github.com/ipfs/ipfs-docs/pull/1444/files#diff-4a2f396b026959f2b7e270fdba96eb753a21a68f5895eb3f4fd20e9666a7ec4fR12-R18
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is overall a significant improvement
Co-authored-by: Daniel Norman <1992255+2color@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Norman <1992255+2color@users.noreply.github.com>
Cheers @2color confirmed locally and updated the copy per #1444 (comment) |
In (currently in progress), @2color pointed out that we should probably remove the alpha software warning in this file ipfs/ipfs-docs#1444 (comment) because the software is no longer in alpha (right?) @2color anything else you'd suggest updating here?
@TMoMoreau Mo could I get a copy review on this PR? This is one of those pages in the docs that will probably be iterated on a few times, but this PR seems to improve some stuff and has tech approval |
@ElPaisano Sure thing, I've actually already reviewed it, just forgot to actually leave the review, I'll give it another quick scan. Also, I'm not sure who has the GitHub name |
@TMoMoreau cheers, just pushed a quick update for some typos / nits Fixed the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
Latest draft click here
Describe your changes
Addresses #1443 and #1440 - read issue descriptions
Hey reviewers 👋 discussion:
Files Changes
Checklist before requesting a review
Checklist before merging